Cases 1 - 10 of 845
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Gonzalez v. Lexington Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv10908
Plaintiff:
Tania Gonzalez
Defendant:
Lexington Police Department, Christopher Barry, Michael Barry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Taylor v. DHL Supply Chain, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02223
Plaintiff:
Tania Taylor
Defendant:
DHL Supply Chain, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 a Family Medical Leave Act
GAETE ET AL v. ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE
as 2:2024cv01396
Plaintiff:
MARIA P. GAETE, MICHELLE B. SMITH and TANIA L. SMITH
Defendant:
ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Roundtree-Cohen-McCrorey-Palmer-Mirzz-Walker-Douglas et al v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
Queen Princess Anjaknie Roundtree-Cohen-McCrorey-Palmer-Mirzz-Walker-Douglas, Elizabeth Queen, Andrew and others
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, Jen Zarozi, Devin and others
Eastin v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01218
Plaintiff:
Tania Eastin
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv30031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Velasquez Murcia, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1250
Petitioner:
CRISTIAN NAHUM VELASQUEZ MURCIA, TANIA ESTELA PAZ RIVERA and DANIELA NAZARET VELASQUEZ PAZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Tanner-Smith v. State Farm General Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv01147
Plaintiff:
Tania Haley
Defendant:
State Farm General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Illescas-Pillco v. Garland
as 24-200
Petitioner:
TANIA MARIBEL ILLESCAS-PILLCO and ALEX MATIAS LOJA-ILLESCAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
