Cases 1 - 10 of 1,774
TATUM et al v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE CO. et al
as 2:2024cv02086
Plaintiff:
JULIE TATUM and VINCE BRACCILI
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE CO. and THOMAS E. MURRAY, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Lovoi v. Barra et al
as 1:2024cv00560
Plaintiff:
Gerald Joseph Lovoi
Defendant:
Mary T. Barra, Aneel Bhusri, Wesley G. Bush and others
TATUM v. LIFECELL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv05904
Plaintiff:
HAZEL MARIE TATUM
Defendant:
LIFECELL CORPORATION and ALLERGAN USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tatum v. Criaye et al
as 3:2024cv01183
Plaintiff:
Bobby Tatum
Defendant:
C/O Criage, Lt. Bradford, Lt Auston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAVALIERE v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP et al
as 3:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
GRAYSON CAVALIERE
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP, WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST, WALMART INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McMahan et al v. Olin Corporation et al (JRG1)
as 1:2024cv00096
Defendant:
Olin Corporation, Lonza Walkersville, Inc., Olin Chlor Alkali Products and others
Plaintiff:
LaMotta McMahan, Mauricio Acevedo, Marilyn B. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Miller v. Wise
as 7:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Justin Michael Miller
Defendant:
J. Wise and T. Tatum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McPherson v. Benedict et al
as 6:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Brentrez Jarmykus McPherson and Royal Great Levi King - Chief Levi Priest Yaheshiah
Defendant:
Pope Benedict, Department of Corrections, Georgia Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Peeples, et al v. Rachael Campbell, et al
as 24-1342
Plaintiff:
James Peeples and Tasiah Lee
Defendant:
Rachael Campbell, David McCormick, Judge, James Dunham and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
