Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00690
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Thaxton v. Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC et al
as 1:2026cv05340
Defendant: Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, House of Cheatham, Inc., House of Cheatham LLC and others
Plaintiff: Allesha Thaxton and Sharon Crawford
: Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv07183
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Alice Felts v. Pamela Thaxton
as 25-14258
Plaintiff: ALICE FELTS
Defendant: PAMELA THAXTON
Thaxton v. Bryson et al
as 3:2025cv01357
Plaintiff: Lamonez Thaxton
Defendant: Tyler Bryson, Jonathan McGuire and Sam Galluzzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saffold v. Thaxton et al
as 1:2025cv12797
Plaintiff: Tyjuan Saffold
Defendant: Jaaneil Thaxton, Tina Ellis and Noble Network of Charter Schools doing business as DRW College Prep
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-2227
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thaxton et al v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2025cv05663
Plaintiff: Ansley Thaxton and Markus Thaxton
Defendant: NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Felix Thaxton v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2025cv09389
Petitioner: Felix Thaxton
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Porter v. Dole et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2025cv03190
Plaintiff: Rayvon Porter
Defendant: (fnu) Dole, (fnu) Thaxton and Ernesto Terranza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?