Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Emrit et al v. The Republic of Cuba et al
as 1:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segreated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United Emrits of America
Defendant:
The Republic of Cuba, Embassy of Cuba, Cuban Intelligence Service (CIS) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Emrit et al v. The Republic of Cuba et al
as 3:2024cv00629
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segreated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United Emrits of America
Defendant:
The Republic of Cuba, Embassy of Cuba, Cuban Intelligence Service (CIS) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
EMRIT v. THE REPUBLIC OF CUBA et al
as 2:2024cv04707
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
THE REPUBLIC OF CUBA, THE EMBASSY OF CUBA, CUBAN INTELLIGENCE SERVICE (CIS) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 et al v. The Republic of Cuba et al
as 3:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535, Ronald Satish Emrit and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 doing business as United Emrits of America
Defendant:
The Republic of Cuba, Embassy of Cuba, Cuban Intelligence Service and others
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 v. Rubublic of Cuba, Embassy of Cuba in United States, The et al
as 3:2024cv01738
Plaintiff:
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 & Presidential Committee/Political Action Comittee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United Emrits of America also known as Ronald Satish Emrit and Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Republic of Cuba, Embassy of Cuba in United States, The, Cuban Intelligence Service and Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emrit v. The Republic of Cuba et al
as 1:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 & Presidential Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 doing business as United Emrits of America
Defendant:
The Republic of Cuba, Embassy of Cuba, Cuban Intelligence Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Villoldo et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2022cv23502
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Villoldo, Gustavo E. Villoldo, individually and as Administrator, Executor, and Personal Representative of the Estate of Gustavo Villoldo Argilagos and Gustavo E. Villoldo
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Fidel Castro Ruz, Raul Castro Ruz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Villoldo et al v. Republic of Cuba, The
as 1:2021cv02497
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Villoldo, Gustavo E. Villoldo and Gustavo (I) E. Villoldo
Defendant:
Republic of Cuba, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1610
Vera v. The Republic of Cuba
as 1:2012cv01596
Plaintiff:
Aldo Vera, Jr.
Petitioner:
Alfredo Villoldo, Jeanette Fuller Hausler, Gustavo Villoldo and others
Defendant:
The Republic of Cuba and Banco Financiero Internacional S.A.
Garnishee:
RBS Citizens, N.A., Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Commerzbank AG and others
Respondent:
Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A., HSBC Bank USA, N.A., Bank of New York Mellon and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
BBVA Colombia S.A., AT&T Corp., Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. and others
Not Yet Classified:
MOPEDS Slovakia L.T.D., Unicredit Bank Czech Republic and Slovakia, a.s. and Wiliam Fuller
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Banco do Brasil, S.A., BPD Bank, Banco Internacional De Comercio, S.A. and others
Intervenor:
National Bank of Canada, National Bank Financial Group and Gustavo E. Villoldo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vera v. Republic of Cuba, The
as 1:2020cv20774
Plaintiff:
Aldo Vera
Defendant:
The Republic of Cuba
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
