Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Mary Rogers v. IRS, et al
as 20-17294
Defendant:
PAUL J. ENJALRAN, IRS Officer, Area #6, DAVE ROUGHTON, President/CEO Safe Credit Union Deposits Service, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY A. NELSON ROGERS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES P. RETTING, IRS Commissioner and UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Committe v. AACSB International et al
as 3:2020cv00372
Defendant:
Susan Capalbo, Board of Trustees of Oregon State University, AACSB International and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Committe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
United States of America v. Kramer et al
as 8:2017cv00536
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thomas C. Kramer and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Hulbert et al v. Schuster Company et al
as 3:2016cv50273
Plaintiff:
Nick S Hulbert and Tracey Hulbert
Defendant:
Schuster Company and Thomas Lyle Kramer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kramer et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 4:2016cv01476
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Kramer and Alice J. Kramer
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Steven Hagens v. Milo Farnham, et al
as 12-3888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Steven Hagens
Defendant - Appellee:
Dr. Milo Farnham, Rodney Lentz, Dr. John Matthews and others
Christopher Bailey, et al v. United States Enrichment Corp., et al
as 12-4374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER D. BAILEY, THOMAS A. KRAMER and BRET COLLIER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ENRICHMENT CORPORATION and SEVERANCE PLAN FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES OF UNITED STATES ENRICHMENT CORPORATION
Kramer v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2008cv15182
Plaintiff:
Thomas A Kramer
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
