Cases 1 - 10 of 50
In re: Thomas Hill
as 24-1246
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS AUSTIN HILL, a/k/a Bop Hill, a/k/a Thomas Austin Stezo, a/k/a Stezo Hill, a/k/a Tommy Hill, a/k/a Thomas Austin Hill, Jr., a/k/a Vincent White
Trujillo et al v. Deglandon et al
as 9:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Alejandrina Perez Trujilo and Jacinto De La Garza Valdez
Defendant:
Cody Deglandon, Thomas Austin, Danna Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AUSTIN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv13086
Plaintiff:
THOMAS AUSTIN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Dickey
as 23-50103
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Thomas Austin Dickey, III
Austin v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv07154
Plaintiff:
Thomas Austin
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Austin v. The Estate of Norberto Morfa et al
as 1:2022cv00867
Plaintiff:
Thomas Austin
Defendant:
The Estate of Norberto Morfa and Bernalillo County Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michaels v. Locke et al
as 3:2022cv01224
Plaintiff:
Carlon J Michaels
Defendant:
Angela M Locke, Kristina L Hemrich, Thomas Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Austin et al
as 3:2022cv01027
Plaintiff:
Martel E. Jackson
Defendant:
Thomas Austin, Rob Jeffreys, DeAnna Kirk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michaels v. Locke et al
as 1:2022cv01168
Plaintiff:
Carlon J Michaels
Defendant:
Angela M Locke, Kristina L Hemrich, Thomas Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
