Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Anthony Cain v. Thomas Evans, et al
as 24-5194
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CAIN, aka Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
THOMAS EVANS, Sergeant, DANA PENNIGER, Lieutenant, JORDAN KIESTER, Lieutenant and others
Evans et al v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00715
Plaintiff:
Thomas Evans and Jennifer Evans
Defendant:
The Cincinnati Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Evans v. USA
as 4:2023cv00135
Petitioner:
Philip Thomas Evans
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
EVANS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv34043
Plaintiff:
THOMAS EVANS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55556
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gordon v. New Orleans City et al
as 2:2022cv05297
Plaintiff:
Kendale Gordon
Defendant:
City of New Orleans, Barrett Morton, Orlando Mathews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv02189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
EVAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14740
Plaintiff:
GREGORY THOMAS EVAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
EVANS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08908
Plaintiff:
BLAKE THOMAS EVANS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bradley v. Dillon et al
as 1:2022cv00453
Plaintiff:
Jamaal R. Bradley
Defendant:
Chris M. Dillon, Jon Thomas Evans, Laurence A. Dunne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
