Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Houston v. Hazelwood
as 25-40776
Plaintiff:
Reddie Houston
Defendant:
C. F. Hazelwood, Director/Commissioner of the State of Texas Department of Corrections, James Danheim, Warden of Stiles Unit, Thomas Ewing, Chaplain of the Texas Department of Corrections and others
Houston v. Hazelwood et al
as 9:2025cv00100
Plaintiff:
Reddie Houston
Defendant:
C.F. Hazelwood, James Danheim and Thomas Ewing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Hazelwood et al
as 1:2025cv00155
Plaintiff:
Reddie Houston
Defendant:
C.F. Hazelwood, James Danheim and Thomas Ewing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Texas Dept of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2025cv00045
Plaintiff:
Reddie Houston
Defendant:
Texas Dept of Criminal Justice, James Danheim and Thomas Ewing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Ewing et al
as 1:2024cv00492
Defendant:
Thomas Ewing, C.F. Hazelwood, T. Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Reddie Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01906
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ewing Parks
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis v. Ewing et al
as 1:2021cv01303
Plaintiff:
Jessie Roy Hawkins Davis
Defendant:
Thomas Ewing, Justin Jochums, Jeff Standard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sainz Ewings v. Ewings et al
as 0:2020cv02020
Defendant:
Ewings Associates, Inc. and Matthew Thomas Ewings
Plaintiff:
Patricia Sainz Ewings
Zelesnik v. Summit Behavioral Healthcare et al
as 1:2019cv00978
Defendant:
Thomas Ewing, Michael Welsh, Judge Burch and others
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barr et al v. Ewing et al
as 3:2016cv01324
Plaintiff:
Mozella Barr and Christoper Barr
Defendant:
Thomas Ewing and Novelis Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
