Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Annamalai Annamalai v. Daniel Sproul, et al
as 26-3293
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RANDALL PASS, Medical Director, USP Marion, THOMAS FLEMING, C/O, USP Marion and others
Plaintiff:
ANNAMALAI ANNAMALAI
Annamalai Annamalai v. USA
as 26-3202
Defendant:
RANDALL PASS, THOMAS FLEMING, GARY BURGESS and others
Plaintiff:
ANNAMALAI ANNAMALAI
Fleming et al v. Malachi Haugen Construction, LLC et al
as 0:2026cv03188
Plaintiff:
Thomas Fleming and Melissa Fleming
Defendant:
Malachi Haugen Construction, LLC and Malachi Haugen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fleming v. Easley
as 4:2024cv04023
Petitioner:
Thomas Fleming
Respondent:
Sheriff Wayne Easley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fleming, Stephen v. Tutas, Nancy et al
as 3:2023cv00713
Plaintiff:
Stephen Thomas Fleming
Defendant:
Nancy Janet Tutas, Edward Paul Tutas and Julie Erin Fleming
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
FLEMING v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12746
Plaintiff:
THOMAS FLEMING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lupita Barbosa, et al v. Shasta County, et al
as 22-16583
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LUPITA BARBOSA, K. B., T. B. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SHASTA COUNTY, ERIC MAGRINI, Shasta County Sheriff-Coroner, JOSE GONZALEZ, Sergeant and others
Annamalai v. Sproul et al
as 3:2022cv01541
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
Daniel Sproul, Nathan Simpkins, Gary Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv03547
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FLEMING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv34186
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS FLEMING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
