Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Lynch v. Filice et al
as 2:2024cv00340
Defendant:
Maureen Lynch, Randazzo Filice, Marcela Filice and others
Plaintiff:
Anne Dowdell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Presnall et al v. Analogic Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv06662
Plaintiff:
Craig Presnall , Brian Huber , Jeff Rushing and others
Defendant:
Analogic Corporation and Oncura Partners Diagnostics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Presnall et al v. Analogic Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00830
Defendant:
Analogic Corporation and Oncura Partners Diagnostics, LLC
Plaintiff:
Barry Bentle, Don Book, Jean Bordelon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Haas et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2015cv02528
Plaintiff:
Alice Marie Haas and Thomas Haas
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANDY v. MILLVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2013cv01584
Plaintiff:
GERMAINE HANDY
Defendant:
MILLVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT , THOMAS HAAS , CITY OF MILLVILLE and others
Counter_claimant:
MILLVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT , CITY OF MILLVILLE and THOMAS HAAS
Counter_defendant:
GERMAINE HANDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haas et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv08181
Plaintiff:
Nancy Haas and Thomas Haas
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VIDRO v. PUMAREJO et al
as 1:2011cv04790
Plaintiff:
PAUL VIDRO
Defendant:
JULIO PUMAREJO , CITY OF MILLVILLE , THOMAS HAAS and others
Cross_claimant:
JULIO PUMAREJO
Cross_defendant:
CITY OF MILLVILLE , THOMAS HAAS and JOHN DOE(S) I-V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BENDY v. ROSS et al
as 3:2008cv00864
Plaintiff:
MARK BENDY, SR
Defendant:
YOLETTE C. ROSS, THOMAS HAAS and NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
