Cases 41 - 50 of 116
King v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2018cv00156
Petitioner:
Calvin Thomas King
Respondent:
State of Minnesota and County of Hinnepin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King v. United State of American et al
as 0:2017cv05575
Plaintiff:
Calvin Thomas King
Defendant:
United State of American and D.O.C. Stillwater
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2017cv05346
Petitioner:
Calvin Thomas King
Respondent:
State of Minnesota and County of Hinnepin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2017cv05264
Plaintiff:
Calvin Thomas King
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, D.O.C., Lindsey Jennelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv00058
Plaintiff:
George Thomas King
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
King v. Anderson et al
as 0:2017cv05196
Petitioner:
Calvin Thomas King
Respondent:
Corey Anderson , Amanda Anthony , Jeff Austrong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Odom v. Cannon et al
as 5:2017cv02487
Petitioner:
Christopher Odom
Respondent:
Al Cannon, Chief Beatty, Stephanie Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Talley et al v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2017cv01632
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley, Minorities of Pennsylvania and PA. Americans with Disabilities
Defendant:
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Centre County's Courthouse, District Attorney's Office of Centre County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. AbbVie Inc et al
as 1:2017cv04735
Plaintiff:
Thomas King
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc, Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROOKS v. WILKINSON COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2017cv00033
Plaintiff:
SHAUN DAVID BROOKS
Defendant:
WILKINSON COUNTY GEORGIA , RICHARD CHATMAN , THOMAS KING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
