Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Leischner v. Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv10538
Plaintiff:
Thomas Robert Leischner
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McKinley v. Holland Enterprises LLC et al
as 5:2026cv01756
Plaintiff:
Austen McKinley
Defendant:
Holland Enterprises LLC and Thomas Robert Lambiase, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Arterburn v. Brueggemann, Et al.
as 3:2026cv00825
Plaintiff:
Thomas Robert Arterburn
Defendant:
Brian G Brueggemann, Tom Haine, Bill Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Thomas Tichich v. Paul Schnell
as 26-1795
Plaintiff:
Thomas Robert Tichich
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Corrections - sued in his official capacity
PETERSEN v. STATE OF IDAHO
as 1:2026cv00656
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ROBERT PETERSEN
Defendant:
STATE OF IDAHO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petersen v. Idaho, State of
as 2:2026cv00479
Petitioner:
Thomas Robert Petersen
Respondent:
Idaho, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Boyle et al v. Kramer
as 5:2025cv13857
Defendant:
Steven Kramer
Plaintiff:
Thomas-Robert Boyle and Denise-Marie Boyle
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Reynolds et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv13219
Plaintiff:
Daniel Reynolds, Curtis Reddick, Bertrand Francis Reed, Jr. and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Miraolglli Grady v. Safoglu et al
as 4:2025cv04185
Plaintiff:
Meltem Miraloglu Grady
Defendant:
Oguz Kamil Safoglu, Ulku Gozen, Onur Akay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
chu v. Tami Fawcett LLC et al
as 4:2025cv04568
Defendant:
Tami Fawcett LLC and Thomas Robert Rupel
Plaintiff:
Manuel Chu Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
