Cases 1 - 10 of 23
JOHNSON et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00807
Plaintiff:
ABARA JOHNSON, ANN HAYES, ANNIE SCOTT and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., TMX FINANCE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Hall v. Joliet Treatment Center
as 1:2022cv04461
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Hall
Defendant:
Joliet Treatment Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Joliet Treatment Center
as 1:2022cv01257
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Hall
Defendant:
Joliet Treatment Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Case et al
as 3:2022cv03086
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Hall
Defendant:
Jean Marie Case, Targenise Porter, Darlene Hendrickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Logan Correctional Center
as 3:2020cv03085
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Hall
Defendant:
Logan Correctional Center
Respondent:
Teri Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 6:2020cv00074
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kayla Belt, et al v. Jean Abel, et al
as 20-1237
Defendant / Appellee:
BRET COPELAND, JEAN ABEL, MARGARET DREES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAN D. CROSS and KAYLA R. BELT
Belt et al v. Abel et al
as 2:2019cv01899
Defendant:
Tiffany Hall, Bret Copeland, Jean Abel and others
Plaintiff:
Kayla R Belt and Sean D Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. BAILEY et al
as 1:2019cv00287
Defendant:
K. ADAMS, UNKNOWN NAMED WHITE MALE FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGIST, MILES KIVETT and others
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. BAILEY et al
as 1:2019cv00277
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT., SMITH/KEEFE COMMISSARY/PROVIDER, CATRINA THOMPSON and others
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
