Cases 1 - 10 of 13
DUVALL v. FERGUSON et al
as 1:2018cv03768
Defendant:
JAMES HENDRIX, HEATHER ROBERTSON, ANGELA LAMBERT and others
Plaintiff:
TAMI LAINE DUVALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowell Green v. State of Texas, et al
as 17-50948
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOWELL QUINCY GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, HONORABLE MATT JOHNSON, PROSECUTOR BRANDON LUKE and others
Lowell Green v. State of Texas, et al
as 17-50648
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOWELL QUINCY GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, HONORABLE MATT JOHNSON, PROSECUTOR BRANDON LUKE and others
Lowell Green v. Tom Gray, et al
as 17-50588
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOWELL QUINCY GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHIEF JUSTICE TOM GRAY, Tenth Court of Appeals, JUSTICE REX D. DAVIS, Tenth Court of Appeals and JUSTICE AL SCOGGINS, Tenth Court of Appeals
Green v. Gray et al
as 6:2017cv00131
Defendant:
Justice Rex D. Davis, Chief Justice Tom Gray and Justice Al Scoggins
Plaintiff:
Lowell Quincy Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. State of Texas et al
as 6:2017cv00092
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Court of Criminal Appeals, Justice Rex D. Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Lowell Quincy Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reece v. Whitley et al
as 3:2015cv00361
Plaintiff:
James R. Reece
Defendant:
L. Ray Whitley, Chris Vines, The City of Gallatin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solis v. Livingston et al
as 7:2014cv00119
Plaintiff:
Arturo Solis
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Oliver J Bell, Frank Hoke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Knize et al
as 1:2011mc00109
Defendant:
Cathy Cochran, Rex D. Davis, Tom Gray and others
Plaintiff:
Hubert Warren
Hubbard v. Fair Oaks Water District
as 2:2009cv02275
Defendant:
Fair Oaks Water District, Tom Gray and Shane Hickaby
Plaintiff:
Donald Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
