Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
Brown v. Scott et al
as 2:2023cv00162
Plaintiff: Tony Lee Brown
Defendant: Matthew Scott and Jason Mosier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01486
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01489
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01487
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01472
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01434
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
MULLIS v. LASKA et al
as 1:2022cv01806
Plaintiff: BRENT DEWAYNE MULLIS
Defendant: SARA LASKA and TONY LEE KUMMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03174
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
MULLIS v. KUMMER et al
as 1:2022cv01338
Plaintiff: BRENT DEWAYNE MULLIS
Defendant: TONY LEE KUMMER and COLUMBUS INDIANA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saldate v. City of Morgan Hill et al
as 5:2021cv08226
Plaintiff: Isaiah Saldate
Defendant: City of Morgan Hill, Kira Sareli, Tony Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?