Cases 41 - 50 of 119
Powell v. Fugate et al
as 6:2017cv00122
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Powell
Defendant:
David Fugate , Carlo W B. Young , Tony Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. R Treasures LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00261
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
R Treasures LLC and Toni Smith
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Communications Act of 1934
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1806
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Suggs et al v. Express Courier International, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00275
Plaintiff:
Chris Averette, Joshua Burrus, Traci Calbert and others
Defendant:
EMP LSO Holding Corporation and Express Courier International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez et al v. Associated Blind H.D.F.C. et al
as 1:2017cv00870
Plaintiff:
Sixto Lopez and Leola Lopez
Defendant:
Associated Blind H.D.F.C., Don Smith, Arco Management Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moon et al v. Doerge et al
as 1:2016cv00208
Plaintiff:
Darnell Wesly Moon and Mable Anderson
Defendant:
Charles Doerge, V, Mark J. Unterreiner, Toni Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00852
Plaintiff:
Timothy Smith , Morris Borden , Romaro R. Smith and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
US v. Namond William
as 16-6817
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NAMOND EARL WILLIAMS, a/k/a Namond Brewington, a/k/a Tony Smith
In re: Tony Smith
as 16-13768
Petitioner:
In re: TONY SMITH
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
