Cases 41 - 50 of 194
Annakutty Joseph v. Target Stores, Inc.
as 20-1730
Defendant / Appellee:
TARGET STORES, INC., a/k/a Target Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANNAKUTTY JOSEPH
Grant v. Target Corporation, et al.
as 3:2020cv00394
Defendant:
Target, Dayton-Hudson Corporation, Target Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Sherrell Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Martino et al v. Target Corporation
as 1:2020cv01128
Plaintiff:
Janet Martino and Ralph Martino
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nance-Williams v. Target Stores et al
as 2:2020cv01584
Plaintiff:
Gloria Nance-Williams
Defendant:
Target Corporate Services Inc, Target Stores, Target Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Poole v. Target Corporation
as 3:2020cv00014
Plaintiff:
Keena Poole
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Floystad v. Target Corporation
as 1:2020cv00178
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Plaintiff:
Kathleen M Floystad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fraser-Dodoo v. Target Corporation et. al
as 8:2019cv03285
Defendant:
Target, Target Enterprise, Inc. and Target Corporation
Plaintiff:
Patricia Fraser-Dodoo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RATCLIFF v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00174
Defendant:
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC, CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC., L'OREAL USA CREATIVE INC. As Subrogee Of THE MAYBELLINE CO. As Subrogee Of MAYBELLINE INC. doing business as MAYBELLINE formerly known as MAYBELLINE COSMETICS CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
RATCLIFF and JODY E. RATCLIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cooper v. Target Corporation et al
as 8:2019cv02945
Plaintiff:
Bonnie L. Cooper and Bonnie Cooper
Defendant:
Target Corp, Target Corporation and Maria Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
