Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-3053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Doe v. Tata et al
as 4:2026cv07826
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Somasekhar Tata, Mahesh Tata, Anuradha Arcot Chelvaraj and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Hellrigel v. Tata Consultancy Services Limited et al
as 3:2026cv01487
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Hellrigel
Defendant:
Tata Consultancy Services Limited, Corebridge Institutional Investments Holdings Corp., Next Level Business Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv03556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Esther St. Hilaire v. Tata Consultancy Services Limited et al
as 5:2026cv04424
Plaintiff:
Esther St. Hilaire
Defendant:
Tata Consultancy Services Limited and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
