Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Driggs v. City of Ocean Springs Police Dept. et al
as 1:2019cv00267
Defendant:
City of Ocean Springs Police Dept., City of Ocean Springs, Terry Hines and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Driggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hines v. Pilgrims Pride
as 1:2019cv00011
Defendant:
Pride Pilgrims and Pilgrims Pride
Plaintiff:
Terry Hines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Hebert v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2015cv00850
Defendant:
Charles Bridges, City of Baton Rouge, East Baton Rouge Parish and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Hebert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shabazz v. State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2014cv00290
Respondent:
Buddy Caldwell, Richard Deville, Terry Hines and others
Petitioner:
Malik A. Shabazz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Casey Williams v. Terry Hine
as 13-31253
Petitioner - Appellant:
CASEY WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
TERRY HINES, Warden
Hines et al v. Zimmer, Inc., et al
as 1:2012cv06168
Plaintiff:
David Hines and Terri Hines
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HINES et al v. ZIMMER, INC., et al
as 2:2012cv03697
Plaintiff:
DAVID HINES and TERRI HINES
Defendant:
ZIMMER, INC., ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. and ZIMMER ORTHOPAEDIC SURGICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Hines
as 2:2011cv01511
Plaintiff:
Casey Williams
Defendant:
Terry Hines
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. Hines et al
as 2:2010cv03222
Plaintiff:
Charles Taylor
Defendant:
Terry Hines
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
