Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Crosby v. Collins et al
as 7:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Brandon L. Crosby
Defendant:
Larry Collins, David Robinson, Randall Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. The Journal Gazette et al
as 1:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Terry Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
The Journal Gazette, Ashley Sloboda, Lisa Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv03521
Plaintiff:
Romell Young
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Chicago Police Department and Terry Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fabian Cook v. Sam Condo, et al
as 22-1979
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FABIAN ALEXANDER COOK
Defendant / Appellee:
SAM CONDO, 1-Block Unit Manager, TERRY SMITH and LEO DUNN
Smith v. Troulakis
as 2:2022cv03441
Plaintiff:
Terry Smith
Defendant:
Maria A. Troulakis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Suprina M. et al
as 2:2022cv02673
Plaintiff:
Terry Smith
Defendant:
P.O. Suprina M. and PO Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gulley v. England et al
as 6:2022cv00494
Plaintiff:
Britney B. Gulley
Defendant:
Warden Audrey England, Sgt Kyleen Tyson, C.O. Bryce R Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aaron Bressi v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, et al
as 22-1462
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON J. BRESSI
Defendant / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, MS. STANTON, Pre Parole, TERRY SMITH, Hearing Examiner and others
Smith v. Doe et al
as 2:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Terry Smith
Defendant:
John Doe, P.O. Suprina, P.O. Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KROLL v. HIGGINS et al
as 3:2021cv00207
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. KROLL
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. HIGGINS, JR., ANTHONY ZANONI, MICHAEL O. TWIGG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
