Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Christine Benson, et al v. State of Arkansas
as 25-3311
Plaintiff:
Julee Jaeger, on behalf of herself and her minor child, U.J., April Christine Berry, on behalf of herself and her minor children, C.B. and K.B., Kyle Berry, on behalf of himself and his minor children, C.B. and K.B. and others
Defendant:
Fayetteville School District No. 1, Springdale School District, No. 50, Bentonville School District, No. 6 and others
Intervenor:
State of Arkansas
Appellant:
Professor Stephanie H. Barclay, State of Kentucky, State of Alabama and others
Amicus Curiae:
National Education Association, Arkansas Education Association, National Council of Jewish Women and others
Julee Jaeger, et al v. State of Arkansas
as 25-2894
Plaintiff:
Julee Jaeger, on behalf of herself and her minor child, U.J., April Christine Berry, on behalf of herself and her minor children, C.B. and K.B., Kyle Berry, on behalf of himself and his minor children, C.B. and K.B. and others
Defendant:
Fayetteville School District No. 1, Springdale School District, No. 50, Bentonville School District, No. 6 and others
Intervenor:
State of Arkansas
Appellant:
Professor Stephanie H. Barclay, State of Kentucky, State of Alabama and others
Amicus Curiae:
National Education Association, Arkansas Education Association, National Council of Jewish Women and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Samantha Stinson, et al v. State of Arkansas
as 25-2713
Plaintiff:
Julee Jaeger, on behalf of herself and her minor child, U.J., April Christine Berry, on behalf of herself and her minor children, C.B. and K.B., Kyle Berry, on behalf of himself and his minor children, C.B. and K.B. and others
Defendant:
Conway School District, No. 1, Fayetteville School District No. 1, Springdale School District, No. 50 and others
Intervenor:
State of Arkansas
Appellant:
Professor Stephanie H. Barclay, State of Kentucky, State of Alabama and others
Amicus Curiae:
National Education Association, Arkansas Education Association, National Council of Jewish Women and others
Robbie Chrishon-Skinner v. Carl Jones
as 25-1564
Plaintiff:
ROBBIE CHRISHON-SKINNER
Defendant:
CARL C. JONES, individually and in his official capacity as Grand Worthy Patron of Myra Grand Chapter, NOEL C. OSBORNE, SR., individually and in his official capacity as Most Worshipful Grand Master of the Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Maryland and THE MOST WORSHIPFUL PRINCE HALL GRAND LODGE, FREE AND ACCEPTED MASONS, OF MARYLAND AND ITS JURISDICTIONS, INC.
Chrishon-Skinner v. Jones et al
as 1:2025cv00315
Plaintiff:
Robbie Chrishon-Skinner
Defendant:
Carl C. Jones, Noel C. Osborne, Sr. and The Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge, Free and Accepted Masons of Maryland and its jurisdictions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Roake v. Brumley
as 24-30706
Defendant:
Conrad Appel, in his official capacity as a member of the Louisiana State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (LSBESE), Cade Brumley, in his official capacity as the Louisiana State Superintendent of Education, Stacey Melerine, in her official capacity as a member of the LSBESE and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin McCrory, on behalf of themselves and on behalf of his minor children, real party in interest E.M.; real party in interest P.M., real party in interest L.M., Richard Williams, Reverend; on behalf of themselves and on behalf of their minor child, real party in interest N.W., Joshua Herlands, on behalf of himself and on behalf of his minor children, real party in interest E.H., real party in interest J.H. and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Atheists, Incorporated, Conscience Project, Foundation for Moral Law and others
MANSOURI v. THE AGENTS IN THE RECEIVING ROOM OF THE SATELLITES THOSE ARE THE MOST TERRIBLE CRIMINALS et al
as 2:2024cv03204
Defendant:
AGENT NAMED RIHAB BEN MANSOUR, THE AGENTS IN THE RECEIVING ROOM OF THE SATELLITES THOSE ARE THE MOST TERRIBLE CRIMINALS, CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO and others
Plaintiff:
AMINE MANSOURI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MANSOURI v. THE AGENTS IN THE RECEIVING ROOM OF THE SATELLITES THOSE ARE THE MOST TERRIBLE CRIMINALS et al
as 2:2024cv03144
Defendant:
CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, AGENT NAMED JULIA FROM SAN FRANCISCO, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF FLORIDA and others
Plaintiff:
AMINE MANSOURI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shenzhen Shisanlang Technology Co Ltd v. Nancy Protectz, et al
as 2:2024cv03744
Plaintiff:
Shenzhen Shisanlang Technology Co Ltd
Defendant:
THE PARTNERSHIPS and UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A, Nancy Protectz, ACIRAE and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
