Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Fenn v. Troy City Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00597
Plaintiff:
Johnny C. Fenn, Jr.
Defendant:
Troy City Jail , Sanford Wingard , Officer Connell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Felski v. Necci et al
as 2:2016cv01062
Plaintiff:
Thomas G Felski
Defendant:
Daniel Necci , Diane M Resch Donohoo, Phillip Koss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ledell Hammond v. City of Troy, et al
as 15-1841
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEDELL HAMMOND
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF TROY, TROY POLICE DEPARTMENT, 52-4 DISTRICT COURT and others
Hammond v. Troy, City of et al
as 2:2015cv12051
Plaintiff:
Ledell Hammond [E-Filer]
Defendant:
Troy, City of , Troy Police Department , 52-4 District Court and others
Washington v. Bertos et al
as 1:2014cv00799
Plaintiff:
Robert Washington
Defendant:
Isaac Bertos, Troy Police Department and The City of Troy, NY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maddox v. Cope et al (MAG+)
as 2:2013cv00382
Plaintiff:
Booker T. Maddox
Defendant:
William Cope, Jeffery Owens, Officer Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tillis v. Owens et al(MAG+)
as 2:2013cv00342
Plaintiff:
Quincy Tillis
Defendant:
Jeffery Owens , Troy Police Department , Pike County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Talukder v. County of Rensselaer et al
as 1:2012cv01765
Plaintiff:
Michael K. Talukder
Defendant:
County of Rensselaer, City of Troy, City of Troy Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv13344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Norwood v. Mason
as 12-2506
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Clyde J. Norwood, JNR
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Mark Mason, Officer
Defendant - Appellee:
Troy Police Department, Troy, New York, Mayor, Troy, New York and Common Council, Troy, New York
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
