Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Timothy Bork v. Ely Infante
as 24-6218
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY BORK
Respondent:
ELY O. INFANTE, Commander, United States Navy Commandant, Naval Consolidated Brig Charleston
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55600
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alan Dorrbecker v. Ely Infante
as 22-7371
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALAN D. DORRBECKER
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMANDER JOHNNY L. MINCEY, Naval Consolidated Brig Charleston, South Carolina and COMMANDER ELY O. INFANTE, Naval Consolidated Brig Charleston, South Carolina
Respondent:
COMMANDER, UNITED STATES NAVY and COMMANDANT, NAVAL BRIG CHARLESTON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-55954
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1650
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-6015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
O'Donnell v. United States Navy et al
as 0:2021cv02184
Plaintiff:
Mikey J. O'Donnell
Defendant:
United States Navy and Carlton County District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorrbecker v. Commander, United States Navy et al
as 9:2021cv01953
Petitioner:
Alan D Dorrbecker
Respondent:
Commander, United States Navy, Commandant, Naval Brig Charleston and Commander Johnny L Mincey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HEUSS v. DEPARTMENT OF THE UNITED STATES NAVY et al
as 1:2021cv01133
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE UNITED STATES NAVY and BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. HEUSS, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
