Cases 21 - 30 of 440
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16540
Plaintiff:
THEO THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chesavage v. Theo Chocolate, Inc.
as 4:2023cv02739
Plaintiff:
Pamela Chesavage
Defendant:
Theo Chocolate, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
United States v. Theo Walker
as 23-2128
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Theo Walker
Zahar Bey v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv01109
Plaintiff:
Byron Zahar Bey
Defendant:
Correen Johnson doing business as Department of Transportation, (BCPD) Jones, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Personal Injury
WENCESLAOS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08323
Plaintiff:
THEO WENCESLAOS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael Shipton v. Baltimore Gas and Electric Company
as 23-1360
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL SHIPTON
Defendant / Appellee:
BALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, EXELON CORPORATION, EXELON BUSINESS SERVICES COMPANY, LLC and others
Kalogiannis v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv20820
Plaintiff:
Theo Kalogiannis
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Theo Jones v. City of Oakland
as 23-15340
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THEO CEDAR JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF OAKLAND
Ramirez v. 206-16 Hollis Ave. Food Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv00601
Defendant:
Jose Espinal, 206-16 Hollis Ave. Food Corp. doing business as Compare Foods and Theo
Plaintiff:
Fermin Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Shorty v. Day and Night Medical Trans Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Theo Shorty
Defendant:
Day and Night Medical Trans Incorporated, Ammar Adam and Unknown Adam
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
