Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Phillips v. Naphcare, Inc., et al.
as 5:2021ct03099
Defendant:
Christy Bunn, Joseph Lee Hackett, Thomas B. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Denise Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nova Technologies An Employee-Owned Engineering Company v. Smith et al
as 1:2019cv00254
Defendant:
Thomas B Smith, ADDX Corporation, Future Technologies Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nova Technologies An Employee-Owned Engineering Company
BALDWIN v. SMITH
as 1:2016cv01330
Petitioner:
LYNN BARNARD BALDWIN
Respondent:
THOMAS B. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Boyd v. Smith
as 5:2016hc02174
Petitioner:
Darnell Boyd
Respondent:
Thomas B. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Baldwin v. Smith
as 5:2016hc02081
Petitioner:
Lynn Barnard Baldwin
Respondent:
Thomas B. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Smith
as 5:2015hc02278
Petitioner:
Randall S. Williams
Respondent:
Thomas B. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chase Hunter v. Thomas Smith
as 12-2012
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHASE CARMEN HUNTER
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS B. SMITH, individually and in his official capacity as a Florida State Judge, RODRIQUEZ, Judge, individually and in his official capacity as a Florida State Judge, GORDON F. WILLIS, individually and in his official capacity as a Virginia State Judge and others
Chase Hunter v. Thomas Smith
as 12-1863
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHASE CARMEN HUNTER
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS B. SMITH, individually and in his official capacity as a Florida State Judge, RODRIQUEZ, Judge, individually and in his official capacity as a Florida State Judge, GORDON F. WILLIS, individually and in his official capacity as a Virginia State Judge and others
Hunter v. Smith et al
as 3:2012cv00325
Plaintiff:
Chase Carmen Hunter
Defendant:
Thomas B. Smith, Rodriguez, Gordon F. Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
