Cases 1 - 10 of 86
USA, et al v. Veterans Medical Transcription Services, Inc., et al
as 23-7171
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Thomas Bailey, Thomas Erik Bailey and Thomas Bailey
Defendant:
Veterans Medical Transcription Services, Inc., Stone Network, Inc., Steven Rose and others
US v. William Bailey
as 23-4634
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM THOMAS BAILEY
BAILEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv25467
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BAILEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bailey v. USA
as 4:2023cv00118
Petitioner:
William Thomas Bailey
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bailey v. United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Thomas Bailey
Defendant:
United States of America, National Institute of allergy & Infectious Diseases, Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
BAILEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08904
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BAILEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bailey v. Dept. Of Education
as 1:2023cv01089
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bailey
Defendant:
Dept. Of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
BAILEY v. LIBERTY MUTUAL PERSONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv01505
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BAILEY
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL PERSONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BAILEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04971
Plaintiff:
DANIEL THOMAS BAILEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. William Bailey
as 22-4524
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM THOMAS BAILEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
