Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HUNTEBRINKER v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv01230
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CLYDE HUNTEBRINKER
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Styers et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv16148
Plaintiff:
Penny Styers and Thomas Clyde Styers
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AKINS v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63735
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CLYDE AKINS and ELBERTA CORDLE AKINS
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION , OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FIELDS et al v. GAF CORP et al
as 2:2009cv74664
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CLYDE FIELDS, LOUETTA FIELDS and LOUETTA FIELDS
Defendant:
GAF CORP, NATIONAL GPSUM CO, UNION CARBIDE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
White v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2009cv01208
Plaintiff:
Thomas Clyde White
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv13916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Bowling v. Simpson
as 5:2005cv00523
Plaintiff:
Thomas Clyde Bowling, Thomas Clyde Bowling and Thomas Clyde Bowling
Defendant:
Thomas Simpson, Thomas Simpson and Thomas Simpson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bowling et al v. Haas et al
as 3:2007cv00032
Plaintiff:
Thomas Clyde Bowling, Thomas Clyde Bowling, Ralph Baze and others
Defendant:
Scott Haas, John D. Rees, Thomas Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Bowling et al v. Haas et al
as 3:2007cv00007
Plaintiff:
Thomas Clyde Bowling, Thomas Clyde Bowling, Ralph Baze and others
Defendant:
Scott Haas, John D. Rees, Thomas Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
