Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Morgan v. Corrections Corp. of America, et al
as 2:2010cv01584
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dale Morgan
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America , Lucy Cano , Robert Adams, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Dale Morgan v. Matthew Cate
as 2:2010cv03914
Respondent:
Matthew Cate
Petitioner:
Thomas Dale Morgan
De Meo v. Santangelo et al
as 1:2010cv02276
Defendant:
Marie Dale, Thomas Dale, Marie Morelli and others
Plaintiff:
Michael De Meo
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Thomas Morgan v. Corrections Corp. of America, et al
as 10-60188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS DALE MORGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, L CANO, Associate Warden, RUIZ, Correctional Lieutenant and others
The Mississippi Bar v. Beavers
as 3:2009mc00050
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Defendant:
Thomas Dale Beavers
Thomas Morgan v. Corrections Corp of America, et al
as 09-60590
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS DALE MORGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, L CANO, Associate Warden, RUIZ, Correctional Lieutenant and others
Sieber v. Coconut Grove Bank
as 1:2009cv21827
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dale Sieber and Thomas Dale Sieber
Defendant:
Coconut Grove Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Morgan v. Corrections Corp. of America, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00097
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dale Morgan
Defendant:
Corrections Corp. of America, Inc., L. Cano, Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferguson v. Allen
as 3:2009cv00138
Petitioner:
Thomas Dale Ferguson
Respondent:
Richard F. Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Flores et al v. Overstreet
as 1:2008cv00179
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Flores, Stephanie Flores, JM and others
Defendant:
Thomas Dale Overstreet, Larry Weston, Bonnie Weston and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
