Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Nation v. Moore et al
as 3:2022cv05063
Plaintiff:
Jill Nation
Defendant:
Thomas E. Moore and Rock Dental Missouri, LLC doing business as Westrock Orthodontics
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Moore et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv03898
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Moore and Gayle Moore
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perez v. Cullen et al
as 1:2015cv00555
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Thomas Cullen, Thomas E. Moore, Inc. and Thomas Moore, Inc./Video Scene of Delaware Simple IRA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Thomas Moore, Jr. v. James Yate
as 10-56957
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS E. MOORE, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES, Warden
Thomas Moore, III v. CIA
as 10-5248
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Thomas E. Moore, III
Defendant - Appellee:
Central Intelligence Agency
Moore #197193 v. Caruso et al
as 1:2009cv01038
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Moore #197193
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Mary Berghuis, Lori Peak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VALFELLS et al v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2009cv01363
Plaintiff:
SVEINN VALFELLS and THOMAS E. MOORE, III
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Moore v. Employee Benefit Management Corp. et al
as 2:2009cv00444
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Moore
Defendant:
Employee Benefit Management Corp. and Employee Benefit Management Corp. Employee Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
FIRSTFRUIT SALES, INC. et al v. STOREYS' FRUIT & PRODUCE, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv00023
Plaintiff:
FIRSTFRUIT SALES, INC., THOMAS E. MOORE, INC., RYAN POTATO CO. and others
Defendant:
STOREYS' FRUIT & PRODUCE, INC., DANIEL J. STOREY, III, DANIEL J. STOREY, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
