Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Jaye v. United States et al (MAG +)
as 1:2022cv05328
Defendant:
KNUCKLES, KOMOSINSKI & MANFRO, LLP, BERMAN, SAUTER, RECORD & JARDIM, PC, Kemeny, Ramp & Renaud, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Jaye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jaye v. United States et al (MAG +)
as 2:2022cv00376
Plaintiff:
Chris Jaye
Defendant:
United States, Merrick B. Garland, John G. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guinta et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11774
Plaintiff:
David Holmes, Frank Hollen, Ezra Hester and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Song et al
as 4:2017cv01513
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Soo Song, Robert Cessar, Mark R. Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Ross et al
as 5:2016ct03185
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Heather Ross, Officer Miller, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016hc02141
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Willie McCormick and Assoc v. Lakeshore Engineering Serv, et al
as 16-1059
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILLIE MCCORMICK AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Defendant:
LAKESHORE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INCORPORATED, KWAME KILPATRICK, DERRICK A. MILLER and others
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS HARDIMAN, AVINASH RACHMALE, DETROIT CONTRACTING, INCORPORATED and others
Inland Waters Pollution Contro, et al
as 15-105
Petitioner:
In re: INLAND WATERS POLLUTION CONTROL, INCORPORATED, ANTHONY SOAVE, THOMAS HARDIMAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
