Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Abrams et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11573
Plaintiff:
Gary G. Elder, Chris Bilotti, Hector Rivera and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
PIERRE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, TREASURY DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2018cv03443
Plaintiff:
DUQUENE PIERRE
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, TREASURY DEPARTMENT , THOMAS J. BUTLER, JR., DAVID V. CONTI, JR. and others
Cross_claimant:
DAVID DEROSA
Cross_defendant:
ROBERT BAER, THOMAS J. BUTLER, JR., BUTLER & CONTI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
L.F. v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.
as 1:2015cv23098
Guardian Ad Litem:
Thomas J. Butler
Plaintiff:
L.F.
Defendant:
NCL (Bahamas) Ltd. and Santosh Jain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Butler v. Parrish et al
as 6:2014cv02011
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Butler
Defendant:
Jimmy Odell Parrish, Shoals Transportation, LLC and John Does I-XX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sam v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff Office et al
as 2:2010cv00197
Plaintiff:
Clinton Daniel Sam
Defendant:
Jefferson Parish Sheriff Office, Dennis Couvillon, Melvin Francis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darryl Parker v. Thomas Butler, et al
as 09-30357
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL D PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J BUTLER, A F ARMOND, JR., SONNY ARMOND, JR. and others
Parker v. Butler et al
as 2:2008cv04419
Plaintiff:
Darryl D. Parker
Defendant:
Thomas J. Butler, A F Armond, Jr and Sonny Armond, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kronfeld v. Black & C
as 2:1985cv00464
Plaintiff:
Eleanor Burdon, Florence M Bunker, James T Sigounis and others
Defendant:
Murphy Favre, Inc., Lawrence R Mut Enumclaw Lawrence R Mut Enumclaw INS Edlund, Black & Clark Securities and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
