Cases 1 - 10 of 11
KELLY et al v. CITY OF PHILA.-WATER DEPT.
as 2:2016cv02963
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KELLY, JR. and DONALD S. SABATINI
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA.-WATER DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Tom Kelly, Jr.
as 16-10981
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TOM KELLY, JR., a.k.a. Thomas Kelly, Jr.
Thomas Kelly, Jr. v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2014cv07183
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kelly, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and United States of America
KELLY v. LEWIS, et al
as 1:2012cv01385
Plaintiff:
WILLIE THOMAS KELLY, JR.
Defendant:
ROBERT C. LEWIS, RICHARD NEELEY, FINESSE G. COUCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. United States of America et al
as 1:2011cv00383
Petitioner:
John Thomas Kelly, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America and Mary Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Burton et al v. Chrysler Group LLC
as 8:2010cv00209
Plaintiff:
Bryce Burton, Bryce Burton, Bryce Burton and others
Defendant:
Chrysler Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Burton et al v. Chrysler Group LLC
as 8:2010cv00201
Plaintiff:
Bryce Burton, Bryce Burton, Bryce Burton and others
Defendant:
Chrysler Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
KELLY v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2009cv00079
Plaintiff:
WILLIE THOMAS KELLY, JR.
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR and W. BOND
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
KELLY v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2008cv00581
Plaintiff:
WILLIE THOMAS KELLY, JR.
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, DONALD WOODS, W. BOND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Vaughn et al
as 5:2007ct03125
Plaintiff:
Willie Thomas Kelly, Jr.
Defendant:
Nurse Vaughn, Rosemary Davidson, Harry Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
