Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Recupero et al v. Friedli et al
as 1:2019cv00870
Defendant:
Charles A Rienhart, II, Willi Miesch, Peter Friedli and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth A. Recupero and Raymond Morrison
LANGFORD v. GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv01023
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL LANGFORD
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP, PAUL FISHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambliss-Partee v. Knapp et al
as 5:2015cv00435
Plaintiff:
Tina Chambliss-Partee
Defendant:
Thomas Knapp, Tony A.J. Vigo and Angela Vigo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason Hunter v. Thomas Knapp, et al
as 09-2079
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON HUNTER
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS KNAPP, Superintendent of St. Clair County Jail, MEARL J. JUSTUS, Sheriff of St. Clair County, ST. CLAIR COUNTY JAIL and others
Hairston v. Cole et al
as 3:2008cv00569
Plaintiff:
Shauntez Hairston
Defendant:
Brenda Cole, Glenda White, Steven Saunders and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hairston v. Walker et al
as 3:2008cv00362
Plaintiff:
Shauntez T Hairston
Defendant:
Nicole Walker, Jennifer Rude-Little, Wexford Health Sources, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hairston v. Knapp et al
as 3:2008cv00303
Plaintiff:
Shauntez Hairston
Defendant:
Thomas Knapp, Mearl Justus, Mel Weith and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
James Little v. Thomas Knapp, et al
as 08-1910
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES LITTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS KNAPP, MEARL J. JUSTUS, ST. CLAIR COUNTY JAIL and others
Hairston v. McCain et al
as 3:2007cv00687
Plaintiff:
Shauntez T Hairston
Defendant:
Kenneth McCain , Muddasani Reddy , Thomas Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knapp et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 1:2007cv22527
Plaintiff:
Julia Stephens Knapp and Thomas Knapp, Jr.
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
