Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Davis v. Goldsmith et al
as 9:2023cv03059
Plaintiff:
Rev Thomas Louis Davis, Rev. Thomas L. Davis and Thomas L Davis
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, Sherrif Officer Christian D. Anderson, Carmen T. Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Davis v. State of South Carolina
as 1:2023cv02470
Petitioner:
Rev Thomas L Davis and Rev. Thomas Louis Davis
Respondent:
Christian D Anderson, State of South Carolina and Warden of Kirkland Reception and Evaluation Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company
as 2:2020cv00843
Plaintiff:
Thomas L Davis
Defendant:
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Thomas Davi
as 16-4215
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS L. DAVIS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
DAVIS v. BOUWMAN et al
as 1:2013cv01059
Plaintiff:
THOMAS L. DAVIS
Defendant:
WENDELL BOUWMAN, NETSPEND and ACE CHECK CASHING CORP.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Wilson et al
as 9:2013cv00382
Plaintiff:
Thomas L Davis
Defendant:
Christine Wilson, James Bukoffsky, Brian Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cesarz et al v. Wynn Las Vegas LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00109
Plaintiff:
Tina Lambert, Joseph Cesarz, Quy Ngoc Tang and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Joseph C Albanese, Mark Anthony Arboleda, Rosemarie Aromin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
DAVIS v. USA
as 1:2011cv00080
In Re: Thomas L. Davi
as 11-1158
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS L. DAVIS, JR.
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
LEONARD P. STARK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
