Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Reaves v. Schwedo et al
as 4:2023cv01911
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves and Kathy Juanita Reaves
Defendant:
Kevin Schwedo, Thomas Scott Wilkerson, Robert "Rob" Bailes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Artis v. Thornton et al
as 1:2023cv00348
Plaintiff:
Montez Artis
Defendant:
Pimone Thornton, Thomas Scott, David Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Canter et al
as 3:2022cv01023
Plaintiff:
Thomas Scott
Defendant:
Will Canter, K. Drown, Displinary Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Gualtieri et al
as 8:2021cv01623
Plaintiff:
Thomas Scott Smith
Defendant:
Bob Gualtieri, Spiva, Mextzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv02743
Plaintiff:
THOMAS SCOTT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Goings v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2020cv01454
Defendant:
Doe 1, C/O Collaso, Sgt. Sullivan and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Goings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv02966
Respondent:
District Attorney Daniel J. Porter, Debra K. Turner, District Attorney Jon Setzer and others
Petitioner:
Gerson Salmeron Diaz and Gerson Salmeron-Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brey v. Hicks et al
as 4:2019cv00061
Defendant:
Sgt James Hicks, Shevy Odell Meeker, Sgt. Brian Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Nathaniel Brey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Collinsworth et al
as 4:2017cv00706
Plaintiff:
Clifton Earl-Shane Jones
Defendant:
Linda Collinsworth, Scott Collinsworth, Lorenzo Saaverdra Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott Jr. v. Martin et al
as 3:2017cv00868
Plaintiff:
Thomas Scott Jr.
Defendant:
Juston Martin , (f/n/u) Hunt , (f/n/u) Riker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
