Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Puckett v. Liu, et al.
as 25-2538
Plaintiff:
DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT
Defendant:
H. LIU, Captain, DAVID BAUGHMAN, Warden, California State Prison, Sacramento, GREG HAMPTON, Lieutenant, California State Prison, Sacramento and others
Tillo Inc. et al v. Heffernan et al
as 1:2024cv09912
Plaintiff:
Reward Cloud Limited and Tillo Inc.
Defendant:
Robert Heffernan and Talli Digital Payments, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (a) Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
RETZLER et al v. GRABLOSKI et al
as 2:2023cv04219
Plaintiff:
WESTLEY RETZLER and LAURA LEA WARDEN
Defendant:
MICHAEL CRABLOSKI, THERESA JONES, TIMOTHY JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Howell v. Conrad et al
as 2:2019cv02551
Defendant:
Tillo, Baker, D. Baughman and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem J. Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Puckett v. Liu et al
as 2:2019cv02437
Defendant:
Steven M. Bartlett, Charles C. Pierce, David Baughman and others
Plaintiff:
Durrell Anthony Puckett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Widtfeldt v. IRS, et al
as 18-5242
Defendant / Appellee:
Douglas Polsky, Internal Revenue Agent, Nebraska State Bar Association, United States Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James A. Widtfeldt
WIDTFELDT v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2017cv01296
Plaintiff:
JAMES WIDTFELDT
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
US v. Burgos-Figueroa
as 13-2379
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JUSTO BURGOS-FIGUEROA, a/k/a Tillo
CHERRY v. WHITEHEAD et al
as 2:2009cv04161
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL CHERRY
Defendant:
ERIC WHITEHEAD, JOHN AJEBE, FLORORANCE RICHMOND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.