Cases 1 - 10 of 12
US v. Timothy Byrd
as 23-4315
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TIMOTHY BYRD, a/k/a Poochie
US v. Timothy Byrd
as 21-4688
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TIMOTHY BYRD, a/k/a Poochie
Jennifer Ann Jasmaine v. Melinda Ebson
as 20-7369
Defendant:
EDWARD THOMAS, Warden, JANE DOES 1-3, JOHN DOES 1-4 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JARON GIBBS, Correctional Officer, TIMOTHY BYRD, Correctional Officer, DAVID CRANDOL, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DUANE LEROY FOX, f/k/a Jennifer Ann Jasmaine
BYRD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv55764
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY BYRD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jasmaine f/k/a Duane LeRoy Fox v. Thomas et al
as 5:2018ct03227
Defendant:
Kenneth Donald, David Crandol, David Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Ann Jasmaine f/k/a Duane LeRoy Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Augst et al v. Medtronic, Inc et al
as 1:2017cv00187
Plaintiff:
Thomas Augst , Jody Bauer , Amanda Ayres and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jasmaine f/k/a Fox v. Thomas et al
as 5:2017ct03023
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Ann Jasmaine f/k/a Duane LeRoy Fox
Defendant:
Edward Thomas, Ms. Smith, Brad Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byrd v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2016cv00334
Plaintiff:
Timothy Byrd
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Byrd v. Durrani
as 1:2016cv00171
Plaintiff:
Timothy Byrd
Defendant:
Abubakar Atiq Durrani, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henry Michelle et al v. City of Colton Police Department et al
as 2:2010cv08189
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Byrd, Gabriel Byrd, Kelli Byrd and others
Defendant:
City of Colton Police Department, Does and Detective Heusterberg
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
