Cases 31 - 40 of 281
Logan v. Mississippi Dept of Corr
as 22-60172
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Courtney R. Logan
Defendant / Appellee:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Haley Barbour, former governor, Nathan Burlcain and others
Bradley D. McMartin et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv02032
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., Amerex Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley D McMartin, Walter Maddocks, Rodney Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Evans v. North Carolina et al
as 5:2022ct03046
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
North Carolina, Governor Roy Cooper, Erik Hooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Andrew Jones
as 22-6071
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW TIMOTHY JONES
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv64671
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ennis v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2021cv00639
Plaintiff:
Derrill Richard Ennis
Defendant:
Jay Jones, Corey Welch, Timothy Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. $24,100 United States Currency
as 1:2021cv00946
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$24,100 United States Currency
Claimant:
Timothy Jones
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
US v. Timothy Jones
as 21-4405
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TIMOTHY JONES, a/k/a Dog, a/k/a Digity, a/k/a Digity Chemist
McQueen v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2021cv00477
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony McQueen, Jr.
Defendant:
Jay Jones, Corey Welch, Timothy Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphree et al v. Apple Inc
as 2:2021cv00978
Plaintiff:
Donna Murphree, Rob Wright, Rachel Roberts and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
