Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Thatcher v. Holloway et al
as 5:2024cv05070
Plaintiff:
Timothy Joseph Thatcher
Defendant:
Sheriff Shawn Holloway, Lieutenant Greg Hobelman and Lieutenant Tyler Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michiels v. USA
as 3:2023cv05085
Petitioner:
Timothy Joseph Michiels
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SCHITTLER v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2023cv01302
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JOSEPH SCHITTLER
Defendant:
M. ZAKEN, S. RUZAS, M. SWITZER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Nesdahl v. Hampton et al
as 4:2023cv00495
Plaintiff:
Timothy Joseph Nesdahl
Defendant:
Mark F Hampton, Does 20th District Law Enforcement, William Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Sieber
as 7:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Timothy Joseph McKinney
Defendant:
Katie Sieber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
McKinney v. Spartanburg County Detention Center et al
as 4:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Timothy Joseph McKinney
Defendant:
Spartanburg County Detention Center, Spartanburg County and Sheriff Chuck Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Mace v. Prumell et al
as 2:2022cv00711
Plaintiff:
Timothy Joseph Mace
Defendant:
Sheriff Bill Prumell, Jennifer Jordan, Poulton Tamantha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nesdahl v. USA
as 4:2022cv00978
Petitioner:
Timothy Joseph Nesdahl
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Timothy Carroll v. Chris Luebe, et al
as 22-1343
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy Joseph Carroll
Defendant / Appellee:
Chris Luebe, Leon Chapmen, Hunter Lewis and others
Nesdahl v. USA
as 4:2020cv00750
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Timothy Joseph Nesdahl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
