Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Randall McElhaney v. Dustin Williams, et al
as 22-5903
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDALL MCELHANEY
Defendant / Appellee:
DUSTIN WILLIAMS, WILLIAM STEPP, NATHAN BROWN and others
BLM Of The Shenandoah Valley, LLC et al v. Smith et al
as 5:2021cv00060
Plaintiff:
BLM Of The Shenandoah Valley, LLC, Cameron Turley, Bonnie Jo Chapman and others
Defendant:
Donald L. Smith, Timothy Martin and Augusta County, VA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mattison v. Willis, et al
as 4:2021cv00087
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Eliot Mattison
Defendant:
Janie Deborah Willis, Sherry Ann Zamora, Timothy Martin O'Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McElhaney v. Williams et al
as 2:2021cv00019
Defendant:
John Pettit, Dustin Williams, Timothy Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Randall McElhaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jenkins et al v. Simerly et al
as 4:2020cv12940
Plaintiff:
Timothy Martin Jenkins and Hi-Tech Auto Service, Inc.
Defendant:
Kenneth Simerly and Jacques Desrosiers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Evans v. Evans
as 1:2020cv02648
Defendant:
Barbara Ruth Evans and Barbara R Evans
Plaintiff:
Timothy Martin Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Renwick, et al.
as 1:2019cv01452
Defendant:
Peter James Albert, Andre Ashley Craig, Gregory Eugene Schwartz and others
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hi-Tech Auto Service, Inc. v. Allen Park, City of et al
as 2:2019cv11503
Plaintiff:
Timothy Martin Jenkins and Hi-Tech Auto Service, Inc.
Defendant:
David Boomer, Allen Park, City of and Tania Jett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brandi Stokes v. Timothy Sulak
as 18-50676
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRANDI K. STOKES
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY MARTIN SULAK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
