Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Rodney Cobbs v. Helen Pratt
as 25-6233
Plaintiff:
RODNEY E. COBBS
Defendant:
HELEN DENISE PRATT, TYISHA SELLARS, CARDIELLEA BARKSDALE and others
Cobbs v. Pratt et al
as 5:2024ct03165
Defendant:
Kim Breeden, Eric Lippert, Savannah Hill Spence and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Elroy Cobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NOONAN et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv04910
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY NOONAN and ESTATE OF KATHLEEN SKORKA
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LLT Management LLC F/K/A LTL Management LLC and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICE AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kazmierczak v. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al
as 2:2021cv14092
Defendant:
Dr. Benjamin, Environmental Protection Agency, Atlanta Journal Constitution and others
Plaintiff:
Jacek Kazmierczak
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
DropzoneMS, LLC v. Steven Cockayne, et al
as 20-35208
Defendant / Appellee:
NATALIE ROGERS, an individual, DAVID THORPE and PACIFIC NORTHWEST SKYDIVING CENTER, LLC, an Oregon LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
ALEX TOGSTAD, KYLE WILLIAMS and TIMOTHY NOONAN
Plaintiff:
DROPZONEMS, LLC
Defendant:
STEVEN COCKAYNE, an individual
Thomas v. Department of Health and Human Services, et al.
as 2:2017cv02264
Plaintiff:
Carrolet Thomas
Defendant:
Department of Health and Human Services, Jocelyn Samuels, Robinsue Frohboese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mischler v. Office for Civil Rights of this United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2017cv00368
Plaintiff:
Amy Jerrine Mischler
Defendant:
Office for Civil Rights of this United States Department of Health and Human Services and Timothy Noonan
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
