Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Rostami v. Hypernet Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv01813
Plaintiff:
Romein Rostami
Defendant:
Hypernet Inc., Hypernet Labs Inc., Ivan Ravlich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Chapman v. USA
as 1:2020cv81444
Petitioner:
Joshua Todd Chapman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CHAPMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2019cv15424
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
TODD CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Chapman et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp21716
Plaintiff:
William Todd Chapman and Marsha L Chapman
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHAPMAN v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT et al
as 2:2010cv00088
Plaintiff:
J. TODD CHAPMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, EDWARD G. RENDELL, THOMAS CORBETT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CHAPMAN v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT et al
as 1:2009cv02107
Plaintiff:
J. TODD CHAPMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, EDWARD G. RENDELL, THOMAS CORBETT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Watson v. Chapman et al
as 8:2008cv01272
Plaintiff:
Richard Watson
Defendant:
C. Todd Chapman and Earl Moreland
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CHAPMAN v. FSI NORTH AMERICA, INC.
as 2:2007cv01700
Plaintiff:
TODD CHAPMAN
Defendant:
FSI NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Beck-Johnson v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00443
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Beck-Johnson
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and others
Objector:
Georgia Department of Labor and Georgia Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b) Labor - Minimum wage or overtime compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
