Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Diogu v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline et al
as 1:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Diogu Kalu Diogu, II
Defendant:
Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Seana Willing, Amanda M. Kates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Defendant:
Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg, Susan Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Defendant:
Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg, Susan Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Defendant:
Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg, Susan Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Defendant:
Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg, Susan Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2022cv00259
Defendant:
McGregor, Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
ARP II v. INDIANA STATE POLICE et al
as 1:2021cv02626
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL C ARP II
Defendant:
INDIANA STATE POLICE, DOUGLAS CARTER, Charles Sorrells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
