Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Kobza, Alex v. Wolf, Todd et al
as 3:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Alex Jeremy Jay Kobza
Defendant:
Judge Todd Wolf, Judge James Potter, Judge Brazzau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gintner, Lori v. O'Neill, Suzanne et al
as 3:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
Lori A. Gintner
Defendant:
Suzanne C. O'Neill, Michael K. Moran, Gregory J. Strasser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wolf v. City of Sheboygan et al
as 2:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Todd Wolf
Defendant:
City of Sheboygan, Ryan Sorenson, Charles C Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGrath v. Wolf
as 3:2022cv00737
Plaintiff:
John Patrick McGrath, III
Defendant:
Honorable Judge Todd Wolf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGrath v. Wolf
as 2:2022cv01528
Plaintiff:
John Patrick McGrath, III
Defendant:
Honorable Judge Todd Wolf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOLFE v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2022cv06862
Plaintiff:
TODD WOLFE
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wolfe et al v. City of Yuba City
as 2:2016cv01557
Plaintiff:
Todd Wolfe and David Jans
Defendant:
City of Yuba City
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wolfe et al v. City of Yuba City
as 2:2016at00802
Plaintiff:
Todd Wolfe and David Jans
Defendant:
City of Yuba City
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wolfe et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv21808
Plaintiff:
Penny Wolfe and Todd Wolfe
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
