Cases 1 - 10 of 19
PMI Waterford Park, LLC v. Carter et al
as 4:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
PMI Waterford Park, LLC
Defendant:
Tommy Carter and Lisa Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Carter v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv03489
Plaintiff:
Tommie Carter
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CARTER v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv02049
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
TOMMY CARTER
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Premier Pet Products, LLC v. Carter
as 1:2017cv02373
Plaintiff:
Premier Pet Products, LLC
Defendant:
Tommy Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter, Tommie v. Ashton, Sandra
as 3:2014cv00469
Plaintiff:
Tommie Carter
Defendant:
Sandra M. Ashton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter, Tommie v. Cox, Burton et al
as 3:2014cv00470
Plaintiff:
Tommie Carter
Defendant:
Burton Cox and Jolinda Waterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter, Tommie v. Ashton, Sandra et al
as 3:2014cv00399
Plaintiff:
Tommie Carter
Defendant:
Sandra M. Ashton , Ryan P. Armson , Tracy R. Kopfhamer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Watkins v. Jesup FCI Chain of Command, et al
as 14-11307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC WATKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JESUP FCI CHAIN OF COMMAND, and officers and correctional officers, ANTHONY HAYES, Warden, in his individual and official capacity, D. HUDSON, Associate Warden; in his individual and official capacity and others
Eric Watkins v. Jesup FCI Chain of Command, et al
as 13-14871
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC WATKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JESUP FCI CHAIN OF COMMAND, ANTHONY HAYNES, D. HUDSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
