Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Georgia Republican Party, Inc. et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 2:2020cv00135
Defendant:
Thomas Mahoney, III, Tommy Clark, David J. Worley and others
Plaintiff:
Perdue For Senate, National Republican Senatorial Committee, Jean M. Seaver and others
Intervenor Defendant:
DSCC and Democratic Party of Georgia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv29670
Plaintiff:
TOMMY CLARK
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv73582
Plaintiff:
TOMMY CLARK
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington v. City of Norfolk, Virginia, et al
as 2:2019cv00626
Defendant:
Kevin Griffin, Johnnie Herbert, Tommie Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tommy Clark v. Jacqueline Lashbrook
as 17-2212
Petitioner - Appellant:
TOMMY CLARK
Respondent - Appellee:
JACQUELINE LASHBROOK
Gentry v. Covington County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 2:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
Kevin C. Gentry
Defendant:
Covington County Sheriff Dept., MCS Inc, Sumrall City Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois (PLR1)
as 3:2017cv00033
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
Plaintiff:
Tommy Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Harrington et al
as 3:2016cv00507
Plaintiff:
Tommy Clark
Defendant:
Richard Harrington, Salvador Godinez, Vicki Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
