Cases 61 - 70 of 139
Levi Springer v. Randall Mathena
as 13-7198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEVI SPRINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL MATHENA, TERESA PEASE, J. EDNEY and others
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT MCCOWAN and TRACY RAY
Levi Springer v. Randall Mathena
as 13-6214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEVI SPRINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL MATHENA, TERESA PEASE, J. EDNEY and others
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT MCCOWAN and TRACY RAY
Tracy Gibson v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 12-41381
Petitioner - Appellant:
TRACY RAY GIBSON
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
DePaola v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 7:2012cv00592
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Mark Engelke, John Garman and others
Plaintiff:
Eric J. DePaola
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Clarke et al
as 7:2012cv00517
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Officer Flemings and Tracy Ray
Plaintiff:
Dion Randolph Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gholson v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2012cv00584
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Lonnie McDonovan Gholson, Jimmy Gilmore and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie McDonovan Gholson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
X et al v. Everett et al
as 3:2012cv00739
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Lee X, Raheem S. Al-Azim, Charles X and others
Defendant:
J. Everett, R. W. Younce, V. M. Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strickland v. Clarke et al
as 2:2012cv00019
Defendant:
Tony Adams, (First Name Unknown) Ball, James Bentley and others
Plaintiff:
Kim M Strickland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2012cv00459
Petitioner:
Tracy Ray Gibson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gibson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2012cv00118
Petitioner:
Tracy Ray Gibson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
