Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Fields v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2026cv04362
Plaintiff:
Travis Fields
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, Jessie Ferrall, Matthew Hackard and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Indy Vapes LLC et al v. Kobach et al
as 2:2026cv02120
Plaintiff:
McHempire LLC doing business as Abilene Vape and CBD and Indy Vapes LLC
Defendant:
Kris Kobach, Tony Mattivi, Melissa Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fields v. City and County of San Francisco
as 3:2025cv05043
Plaintiff:
Travis Fields
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Holbrook et al v. 3M Company et al
as 7:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Darrell Holbrook, Tammy Holbrook, Eddie Bentley and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Mine Safety Appliances Company, LLC, American Optical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Dowd et al v. Sisolak et al
as 2:2015cv00136
Plaintiff:
Daniel Alires, Austin Dowd, Travis Field and others
Defendant:
Board Of County Commissioners, Susan Brager, Larry Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fields v. Mathena
as 7:2011cv00001
Petitioner:
Ruben Travis Fields
Respondent:
R.C. Mathena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mullen v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2007cv01222
Plaintiff:
William Jermaine Mullen
Defendant:
City of Portland, Travis Fields, Portland Police Bureau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
