Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Rauch v. Robinson et al
as 5:2026cv06103
Plaintiff:
Michael Rauch
Defendant:
Abigail Robinson, Nikki Oaks, Michele Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Duvall v. Travis Terry
as 26-1654
Plaintiff:
John C. Duvall
Defendant:
Travis Terry, Director, Division of Adult Institutions
Rauch v. Strid et al
as 5:2026cv06007
Plaintiff:
Mike Rauch
Defendant:
Myles Strid, CCW Ryan Crews, Trevor Foley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duvall v. Terry
as 2:2025cv04253
Plaintiff:
John C Duvall
Defendant:
Travis Terry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richbow et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv12420
Plaintiff:
Brandon Richbow, Jason Riel, Scott Roark and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Terry v. Roderick et al
as 1:2025cv01829
Plaintiff:
Travis Terry
Defendant:
CMS- Roderick, CM- Miller, Program Supervisor- K. Mcgeady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2025cv00138
Plaintiff:
Travis Terry
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Harris v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2025cv03036
Plaintiff:
Mary Harris
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Matt Sturm, Valarie Moseley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CASE OPENED IN ERROR
as 6:2025cv03035
Plaintiff:
Marry Harris
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Matt Sturm, Valarie Moseley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Human Rights Defense Center v. Foley et al
as 2:2024cv04200
Defendant:
Myles Strid, Trevor Foley and Travis Terry
Plaintiff:
Human Rights Defense Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.