Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bailey v. Garcia et al
as 5:2021cv00948
Plaintiff:
Brent Eugene Bailey
Defendant:
Mario Garcia, DPS Trooper Richard Morales, DPS State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUCY v. NAGY et al
as 2:2020cv01950
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MUCY
Defendant:
TROOPER ZACHARY WEBB and TROOPER RICHARD NAGY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ra-King Allen v. New Jersey State Police, et al
as 19-3138
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RA-KING ALLEN
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, TROOPER RICHARD NUGNES and SUPERINTENDENT NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY, - DIVISION OF STATE POLICE, JOSEPH R. FUENTES
ALLEN v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 3:2016cv01660
Plaintiff:
RA-KING ALLEN
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE , SUPERINTENDENT OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY-DIVISION OF STATE POLICE- JOSEPH R. FUENTES and TROOPER RICHARD NUGNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Bayliss v. New Jersey State Police, et al
as 14-4180
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAMES BAYLISS
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE and TROOPER K. JUCKETT, individually and in his capacity as a member of the New Jersey State Police
Defendant - Appellant:
TROOPER RICHARD WAMBOLD, individually and in his capacity as a member of the New Jersey State Police
Ever Perez v. Richard Gamez, et al
as 14-3539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EVER PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
TROOPER RICHARD GAMEZ, OFFICER ANDREW RICHARD CRONE, BRIAN HUNTER and others
Almonte v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2014cv11865
Plaintiff:
Sauel S. Almonte
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Douglas Varano, Nicholas D. Varano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Perez v. Gamez et al
as 1:2013cv01552
Plaintiff:
Ever Perez
Defendant:
Trooper Richard Gamez, Officer Andrew Richard Crone, Brian Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
